I'm not sure what the correct action in this case actually is, though. While I feel like it's a little ridiculous to target people who use a song for a few seconds in the background of a video, the copyright does belong to Warner. If they don't want it played, that's their prerogative. It's a tricky issue, but hopefully YouTube and Warner can come up with a sensible agreement to retain the rights of both Warner and the public.
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Lorenz: YouTube vs. Warner
I think that companies like Warner need to learn to pick their battles. I understand and respect the fact that they own certain copyrights and have the right to protect them, but most of what's on YouTube seems like it should be a pretty low priority. If a 15 year old wants to sing a Christmas carol that's been around for 60 years, why not let her sing it? We all know it, we've all heard it a thousand times on the radio, so what's the big deal?